Recording Software
SquadCastvsZencastr
Compare SquadCast and Zencastr side by side. See pricing, features, and which is right for your podcast.
Pricing Comparison
| Tier | SquadCast | Zencastr |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Descript Free: limited media minutes, 720p watermarked export, 2 hrs recording per drive | Free tier with trial-style limits; see site for current storage and export rules |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
Feature Comparison
| Feature | SquadCast | Zencastr |
|---|---|---|
| Max Participants | 10 | 8 |
| Local Recording | ||
| Separate Tracks | ||
| Video Recording | ||
| Live Streaming | ||
| Transcription | ||
| Editing | ||
| Cloud Storage |
SquadCast Pros & Cons
Pros
- Tight Descript integration
- Progressive upload prevents data loss
- Backstage for guest management
Cons
- Limits tied to Descript media and recording hours
- Limited free tier
- Less established than Riverside
Zencastr Pros & Cons
Pros
- Lossless audio recording
- ZenAI text-based editing
- Affordable pricing
Cons
- Fewer participants than competitors
- No live streaming
- Less polished interface
The Verdict
SquadCast is best for:
- →Descript users wanting recording solution
- →Interview podcasts
- →Browser-based workflow preference
Zencastr is best for:
- →Budget-conscious podcasters
- →Those wanting AI-assisted editing
- →Small team productions