guides

Audacity vs GarageBand vs Adobe Audition: Best Free and Paid DAW for Podcasts

PodRewind Team
8 min read
Audio waveform displayed on computer screen in a recording studio
Photo via Unsplash

TL;DR: Audacity offers powerful free editing on any platform; GarageBand provides intuitive Mac-only editing with non-destructive workflow; Adobe Audition delivers professional features at $22.99/month. Choose based on your platform, budget, and complexity needs.


Table of Contents


Quick Comparison

FeatureAudacityGarageBandAdobe Audition
PriceFreeFree$22.99/month
PlatformWindows, Mac, LinuxMac onlyWindows, Mac
Skill LevelBeginner-IntermediateBeginnerIntermediate-Pro
Non-Destructive EditingNoYesYes
MultitrackYesYesYes
Noise ReductionGoodBasicExcellent
Batch ProcessingLimitedNoYes
Learning CurveModerateLowSteep

Here's the thing: All three can produce professional podcasts. The difference lies in workflow efficiency, feature depth, and how much friction you'll encounter getting there.


Audacity Deep Dive

Audacity remains the most popular free audio editor globally, used by millions of podcasters since its 1999 release.

What Audacity Does Well

Universal platform support: Works identically on Windows, Mac, and Linux. No subscription, no cost, ever.

Core editing capabilities: Cut, copy, paste, trim, fade—all the basics work reliably. Multitrack support lets you layer voice, music, and sound effects.

Noise reduction: Audacity's noise reduction is surprisingly capable for free software. Sample a noise profile, apply it to the full track, and background hum disappears.

Plugin ecosystem: VST and LADSPA plugin support extends functionality. Thousands of free effects, compressors, and tools available.

Export flexibility: Export to virtually any audio format—MP3, WAV, FLAC, OGG, and more.

Audacity's Limitations

Destructive editing: Changes permanently alter your audio file. Unlike non-destructive editors, you can't easily undo decisions made sessions ago. This requires careful workflow planning and frequent saves of backup copies.

Interface age: The interface hasn't fundamentally changed in decades. Functional but not intuitive for modern users expecting streamlined design.

Complex productions: Managing many tracks, extensive effects chains, or precise timing becomes cumbersome. Audacity handles simple edits well but fights you on complex productions.

No real-time preview: Some effects require rendering to hear results, slowing the editing process.

Best Audacity Workflow

  1. Always keep original files: Never edit your only copy
  2. Save projects frequently: Audacity's project format preserves edit history
  3. Export often: Create backup exports at milestone points
  4. Use labels: Mark sections for easier navigation

Ideal Audacity User

Budget-conscious podcasters on Windows or Linux who need basic editing without monthly fees. Works well for podcast editing workflows focused on simple cleanup and assembly.


GarageBand Deep Dive

Apple's free DAW comes pre-installed on every Mac, making it the most accessible option for Apple users.

What GarageBand Does Well

Non-destructive editing: Your original audio stays intact. Every edit creates instructions rather than altering the file. Change your mind anytime without losing work.

Intuitive interface: Apple's design philosophy makes basic tasks obvious. Drag, drop, trim, and arrange without reading manuals.

Built-in sounds: Access Apple Loops, sound effects, and music beds without external downloads. Professional production elements at no cost.

iOS/iPadOS version: Edit podcasts on iPad or iPhone with the same interface. Start editing on the go, finish on desktop.

Smart controls: Automatic level matching and EQ suggestions help beginners achieve balanced audio.

GarageBand's Limitations

Mac-only: No Windows or Linux version. Collaborators on other platforms can't use your project files.

Feature ceiling: Compared to professional DAWs, GarageBand limits track counts, plugin options, and advanced processing. Most podcasters won't hit these limits, but growing productions might.

No batch processing: Process one file at a time. High-volume producers need alternatives.

Export limitations: Fewer format options than Audacity or Audition. Standard podcast formats work fine, but specialized needs may require conversion.

Best GarageBand Workflow

  1. Use templates: Start from podcast templates to skip setup
  2. Organize tracks by purpose: Separate tracks for host, guest, music, effects
  3. Master in GarageBand: Built-in mastering presets work well for podcasts
  4. Export as high-quality MP3: Standard podcast format with good compression

Ideal GarageBand User

Mac users who want polished results without learning curve pain. Perfect for beginners who need podcast recording tips and straightforward editing.


Adobe Audition Deep Dive

Adobe Audition represents professional-grade audio editing with pricing to match.

What Audition Does Well

Spectral editing: Visualize and edit audio in the frequency domain. Remove specific sounds (coughs, sirens, phone rings) without affecting surrounding audio. No free tool matches this capability.

Noise reduction: Industry-leading noise removal. Audition's adaptive noise reduction handles complex environments that defeat simpler tools.

Batch processing: Process hundreds of files with identical settings automatically. High-volume producers save hours weekly.

Multitrack sophistication: Handle complex productions with dozens of tracks, sophisticated routing, and precise automation.

Adobe ecosystem: Seamless integration with Premiere Pro for video podcasts. Share sessions, sync edits, and maintain consistency across audio and video.

Automatic speech alignment: Audition can automatically align multiple recordings of the same content—useful for syncing backup recordings or remote guests.

Audition's Limitations

Subscription cost: $22.99/month (annual) or $34.49/month (monthly) adds up to $275-$414 annually. Cost-prohibitive for hobbyists.

Learning curve: Professional features require professional knowledge. Expect weeks of learning before efficiency exceeds simpler tools.

Resource demands: Audition requires modern hardware. Older computers struggle with large projects or real-time effects.

Overkill for simple edits: Basic podcast editing doesn't need spectral analysis or advanced noise reduction. Simpler tools finish faster for simple tasks.

Best Audition Workflow

  1. Use multitrack sessions: Organize elements across dedicated tracks
  2. Create templates: Build session templates with standard effects chains
  3. Leverage favorites: Save commonly-used presets for quick access
  4. Batch when possible: Apply processing to multiple episodes simultaneously

Ideal Audition User

Professional podcasters, production studios, and video podcasters already in Adobe ecosystem. Worth the cost when advanced features save time or enable capabilities impossible in free tools.


Editing Workflow Comparison

Basic Episode Assembly

Task: Cut intro, main content, and outro together

PlatformStepsTime Estimate
AudacityImport → Arrange → Crossfade manually → Export15-20 minutes
GarageBandImport → Drag to arrange → Auto-crossfade → Export10-15 minutes
AuditionImport → Arrange in multitrack → Crossfade → Export10-15 minutes

GarageBand and Audition tie for basic assembly thanks to non-destructive, visual interfaces.

Noise Reduction

Task: Remove background hum from recording

PlatformProcessQuality
AudacitySample noise → Apply reductionGood
GarageBandUse built-in noise gateBasic
AuditionAdaptive noise reductionExcellent

Audition handles problematic audio that others can't salvage. Audacity's noise reduction is surprisingly good for free software.

Processing Multiple Episodes

Task: Apply identical processing to 10 episodes

PlatformApproachTime Estimate
AudacityManual, one at a time2-3 hours
GarageBandManual, one at a time2-3 hours
AuditionBatch processing20-30 minutes

Audition's batch processing provides massive time savings for high-volume producers.


Learning Curve Analysis

Audacity Learning Path

Week 1: Basic cuts, fades, export Week 2-4: Noise reduction, effects, multitrack basics Month 2+: Plugins, advanced techniques, workflow optimization

Audacity's interface creates friction that slows early progress. Intermediate users find solid productivity.

GarageBand Learning Path

Day 1: Basic cuts, arrange, export Week 1-2: Effects, mixing, templates Month 1+: Advanced techniques, workflow refinement

Intuitive design enables immediate productivity. Most podcasters reach comfort within days.

Audition Learning Path

Week 1-2: Interface navigation, basic editing Month 1-2: Multitrack, effects, noise reduction Month 3+: Spectral editing, batch processing, advanced techniques

Substantial initial investment pays off for heavy users. Casual podcasters rarely justify the learning time.


Making the Right Choice

Choose Audacity If:

  • Budget is zero: Free forever, no compromises on basic functionality
  • You use Windows or Linux: GarageBand isn't an option
  • You need cross-platform: Project files work anywhere Audacity runs
  • Simple editing suffices: Basic cuts and noise reduction meet your needs

Choose GarageBand If:

  • You use Mac: Pre-installed and ready immediately
  • Intuitive matters: Minimal learning curve, maximum immediate productivity
  • You edit on mobile: iOS version enables editing anywhere
  • Non-destructive is important: Preserve original audio throughout editing

Choose Adobe Audition If:

  • You're a professional: Time savings justify subscription cost
  • Audio quality is challenging: Advanced noise reduction rescues problem recordings
  • Volume is high: Batch processing handles workload efficiently
  • You use Adobe already: Creative Cloud bundle reduces incremental cost
  • Video podcasting: Premiere Pro integration streamlines workflow

Hybrid Approaches

Many podcasters use multiple tools:

Audacity + GarageBand: Edit on Mac with GarageBand, share projects with Windows collaborators via Audacity exports.

GarageBand → Audition: Start free with GarageBand, upgrade to Audition when complexity or volume demands it.

Audacity for editing + Dedicated tools for specific tasks: Use Audacity for main editing, specialized tools for noise reduction or mastering.

There's no requirement to choose one tool exclusively. Use what works best for each task.


Beyond the Big Three

Other options worth considering:

Hindenburg Journalist ($95 or $375): Built specifically for spoken word. Automatic leveling, intuitive interface, and podcast-focused features.

Reaper ($60): Professional DAW at fraction of Audition's cost. Steeper learning curve but powerful once mastered.

Descript: Text-based editing changes the paradigm entirely. Edit by editing the transcript rather than waveforms.

Understanding these alternatives helps when the big three don't quite fit your needs.


FAQ

Can I produce professional podcasts with free software?

Absolutely. Audacity and GarageBand both produce broadcast-quality audio when used properly. The limiting factor is typically technique and source audio quality, not software capability. Many successful podcasts edit entirely with free tools.

Is Adobe Audition worth the monthly cost?

Depends on your volume and needs. If you edit multiple episodes weekly and regularly encounter challenging audio, Audition's time savings may exceed its cost. For occasional podcasters editing clean audio, free tools suffice. Calculate time saved versus subscription cost for your specific situation.

Should I learn multiple editing programs?

Eventually, yes. Understanding multiple tools makes you adaptable—you can collaborate with others regardless of their tools, handle edge cases better, and make informed decisions about workflows. Start with one, add others as specific needs arise.


Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash


Ready to make your podcast archive searchable? Start free with PodRewind and find any moment across all your episodes.

podcast-editing
daw
comparison
software

Ready to Get Started?

Search your podcast transcripts, chat with your archive, and turn episodes into content. Start for free today.

Try PodRewind free